T4, 06/05/2026
📢 TIN MỚI
Khai giảng lớp IELTS 6.5 tháng 4/2026 | Đăng ký ngay để nhận ưu đãi | Luyện thi IELTS cấp tốc 3 tháng | IELTSGrading.com - Chấm writing AI miễn phí
IELTS Vocabulary

CAMBRIDGE 20 READING TEST 2 PASSAGE 3

IELTS Reading: Robot Umpires (Robo-umps) | Bài tập tương tác

⚾ Invasion of the Robot Umpires

IELTS Reading – Bài tập YES/NO/NOT GIVEN • Summary Completion • Multiple Choice
📖 ĐỌC BÀI: Robot Umpires (ABS) – The end of arguments?

A few years ago, Fred DeJesus from Brooklyn, New York became the first umpire in a minor league baseball game to use something called the Automated Ball-Strike System (ABS), often referred to as the ‘robo-umpire’. Instead of making any judgments himself about a strike*, DeJesus had decisions fed to him through an earpiece, connected to a modified missile-tracking system. The contraption looked like a large black pizza box with one glowing green eye; it was mounted above the press stand.

Major League Baseball (MLB), who had commissioned the system, wanted human umpires to announce the calls, just as they would have done in the past. When the first pitch came in, a recorded voice told DeJesus it was a strike. Previously, calling a strike was a judgment call on the part of the umpire. Even if the batter does not hit the ball, a pitch that passes through the ‘strike zone’ (an imaginary zone about seventeen inches wide, stretching from the batter’s knees to the middle of his chest) is considered a strike. During that first game, when DeJesus announced calls, there was no heckling and no shouted disagreement. Nobody said a word.

For a hundred and fifty years or so, the strike zone has been the game’s animating force — countless arguments between a team’s manager and the umpire have taken place over its boundaries and whether a ball had crossed through it. The rules of play have evolved in various stages. Today, everyone knows that you may scream your disagreement in an umpire’s face, but you must never shout personal abuse at them or touch them. When the robo-umpires came, however, the arguments stopped.

During the first robo-umpire season, players complained about some strange calls. In response, MLB decided to tweak the dimensions of the zone, and the following year the consensus was that ABS is profoundly consistent. MLB says the device is near-perfect, precise to within fractions of an inch. “It’ll reduce controversy in the game, and be good for the game,” says Rob Manfred, Commissioner for MLB. But the question is whether controversy is worth reducing, or whether it is the sign of a human hand.

A human, at least, yells back. Frank Viola, a coach, said that ABS works as designed, but it was also unforgiving and pedantic, almost legalistic. Some pitchers have complained that compared with a human’s, the robot’s strike zone seems too precise. Viola explained that umpires rewarded skill: “Throw it where you aimed, and it would be a strike, even if it was an inch or two outside. There was a dialogue between pitcher and umpire.”

The executive Morgan Sword said ABS was part of a larger project to make baseball more exciting since executives are terrified of losing younger fans, as has been the case with horse racing and boxing. He explained they asked fans what version of baseball they found most exciting. The results showed everyone wanted more action: more hits, more defense, more baserunning. This type of baseball essentially hasn’t existed since the 1960s, when the hundred-mile-an-hour fastball entered the game. It flattened the game into strikeouts, walks, and home runs — lacking much action. Sword’s team brainstormed fixes. According to Sword, once you get the technology right, you can load any strike zone you want into the system. “It might be a triangle, or a blob, or something shaped like Texas. Over time, as baseball evolves, ABS can allow the zone to change with it.”

In the past twenty years, sports have moved away from judgment calls. But ABS with the strike zone historically has allowed certain discretion. Professor Alva Noë said: “Hardly a day goes by that I don’t run through the reasons that this is such a terrible idea. This is part of a movement to use algorithms to take the hard choices of living out of life.” Joe Russo added: “With technology, people just want everything to be perfect. That’s not reality. I think perfect would be weird. What is there to talk about?”

*strike: a strike is when the batter swings at a ball and misses or when the batter does not swing at a ball that passes through the strike zone.

📌 Questions 27–32

Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer? Choose YES / NO / NOT GIVEN.

27. When DeJesus first used ABS, he shared decision-making about strikes with it.
Giải thích: Đoạn 1: “Instead of making any judgments himself … DeJesus had decisions fed to him” → anh ta không chia sẻ quyết định, chỉ làm theo hệ thống → trái ngược → NO.
28. MLB considered it necessary to amend the size of the strike zone when criticisms were received from players.
Giải thích: Đoạn 4: “players complained … In response, MLB decided to tweak the dimensions” → YES.
29. MLB is keen to justify the money spent on improving the accuracy of ABS’s calculations.
Giải thích: Bài không đề cập đến việc MLB biện minh chi phí tài chính → NOT GIVEN.
30. The hundred-mile-an-hour fastball led to a more exciting style of play.
Giải thích: Đoạn 6: fastball “flattened the game into strikeouts, walks… lacking much action” → không hấp dẫn hơn → NO.
31. The differing proposals for alterations to the baseball bat led to fierce debate on Sword’s team.
Giải thích: Đoạn 6: họ bàn luận về thay đổi gậy bóng chày, nhưng không nói “fierce debate” → NOT GIVEN.
32. ABS makes changes to the shape of the strike zone feasible.
Giải thích: Đoạn 6: “once you get the technology right, you can load any strike zone … triangle, blob, Texas” → YES.

📝 Questions 33–37

Complete the summary using the list of phrases (A-H) below.

Calls by the umpire
Even after ABS was developed, MLB still wanted human umpires to shout out decisions as they had in their . The umpire’s job had, at one time, required a about whether a ball was a strike. A ball is considered a strike when the batter does not hit it and it crosses through a extending approximately from the batter’s knee to his chest. In the past, over strike calls were not uncommon, but today everyone accepts the complete ban on pushing or shoving the umpire. One difference, however, is that during the first game DeJesus used ABS, strike calls were met with .

A. pitch boundary B. numerous disputes C. team tactics D. subjective assessment E. widespread approval F. former roles G. total silence H. perceived area

🔍 Questions 38–40

38. What does the writer suggest about ABS in the fifth paragraph?
Giải thích: Đoạn 5: ABS quá chính xác, “unforgiving and pedantic”, mất đi “dialogue between pitcher and umpire” – làm giảm sự hấp dẫn → B.
39. Morgan Sword says that the introduction of ABS
Giải thích: Đoạn 6: “ABS was part of a larger project to make baseball more exciting since executives are terrified of losing younger fans” → D.
40. Why does the writer include the views of Noë and Russo?
Giải thích: Cả hai đều phản đối sự hoàn hảo tuyệt đối, cho rằng sự chính xác không đem lại niềm vui. Noë nói “terrible idea”, Russo nói “perfect would be weird” → C.
⚾ Chưa có kết quả
Dựa trên bài đọc “Invasion of the Robot Umpires” – Định dạng giống Cambridge IELTS.
Chia sẻ: Facebook Twitter

Leave a Reply