Child Development: Teachers vs Parents
Date: March 2026 | Topic: Education & Family | Học viên: Tuấn Anh
Đề bài
School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Bài làm học viên
It is considered by some that teachers play a more important role in the social and intellectual development of childs1 than their parents. I completely disagree with this statement because parents are the most fundamental educators.
On the one hand, parents have a huge impact in2 their offspring’s behavior. Children often copy what their parents do at home. For example, if a boy see3 his parents helping others, he will learn to be kind and respectful. Furthermore, parents spend more times4 with their kids during their early years, so they can easily teach them essential moral values before they even go to school.
On the other hand, it is true that schools provide a good environment for academic learning. Teachers are trained to teach various subjects. However, the family’s support is still the most crucial factor. For instance, if a first-grade student show5 a strong interest in drawing and math, teachers can provide the basic knowledge, but parents are the ones who nurture this passion at home. Without parental encouragement, students might lack of6 the motivation to study hard.
In conclusion, although teachers are responsible for formal education, I believe that parents takes7 the most important responsibility for a child’s overall social and intellectual growth.
Chi tiết lỗi & Đề xuất
IRREGULAR PLURAL NOUN
“childs” → “children”
“Child” là danh từ bất quy tắc, dạng số nhiều của nó là “children”, không thêm “s”.
PREPOSITION
“impact in” → “impact on”
Cấu trúc cố định luôn là: “have an impact/effect/influence on something/somebody” (có tác động lên ai/cái gì).
S-V AGREEMENT
“a boy see” → “a boy sees”
Chủ ngữ “a boy” là ngôi thứ ba số ít, nên động từ “see” phải thêm “s” ở thì hiện tại đơn.
UNCOUNTABLE NOUN
“times” → “time”
Khi mang nghĩa là “thời gian” (để dành cho ai đó), “time” là danh từ không đếm được. “Times” thêm ‘s’ chỉ dùng khi nói về “số lần”.
S-V AGREEMENT
“a first-grade student show” → “shows”
Tương tự lỗi số 3, “a student” là số ít nên động từ “show” phải chia thêm “s”.
VERB PATTERN
“lack of” → “lack”
Khi “lack” đóng vai trò là ĐỘNG TỪ trong câu, nó đi trực tiếp với tân ngữ (lack something), KHÔNG có giới từ “of”. “Lack of” chỉ dùng khi “lack” là danh từ (a lack of something).
S-V AGREEMENT
“parents takes” → “parents take”
Chủ ngữ “parents” (bố mẹ) là số nhiều, do đó động từ “take” giữ nguyên, không thêm “s”.

Leave a Reply